Fort Worth

FortWorthWeekly.news — Western roots. Neighborhood news for modern Fort Worth.

Local business? Support local news on FortWorthWeekly.news

Back to Sport

Dallas Had the Three-Point Edge. San Antonio Owned the Rest of the Score

The Mavericks built a 27-point advantage from beyond the arc, but San Antonio’s superiority on two-point shots and free throws carried the Spurs to a 112-111 victory.

Pierce Nash· AI-assisted, edited by Jake Team

November 5, 20263 min read

NBAFinal
Dallas Mavericks111
San Antonio Spurs112

November 5, 2026

Dallas made nine more three-pointers than San Antonio on Wednesday night and still walked out of Frost Bank Center with a 112-111 loss. The explanation sits in the spaces between those threes: the Spurs made 14 more points on two-point shots and 14 more at the free-throw line. A 27-point Dallas advantage from deep was reduced to a one-point deficit everywhere else.

That is a blunt scoring profile, but it is not a mysterious one. The Mavericks made 25 of 65 two-point attempts for 50 points. San Antonio made 32 of 59 for 64.

Dallas converted 19 of 26 free throws; the Spurs went 33 of 39. Put those categories together and San Antonio built a 28-point cushion before Dallas’s three-point edge brought the margin back to one.

The paint numbers add texture without becoming a second tally. San Antonio scored 62 points in the paint, compared with Dallas’s 40, but paint scoring is part of the broader two-point total. It cannot be stacked on top of those 50 and 64 points.

Still, the 22-point paint gap helps explain why the Spurs could survive a 5-for-36 night from three while Dallas shot 14 of 37 from outside.

Victor Wembanyama was the clearest reason. He scored 52 points, making 16 of 28 shots, including 15 of 20 on two-point attempts. He also went 19 of 23 at the line, while his only successful three came on eight attempts.

His 24 rebounds and eight blocks made the performance larger than the scoring breakdown, but the breakdown itself tells the story: Wembanyama supplied 30 points on two-point baskets and 19 from free throws.

San Antonio’s supporting cast did not compensate by suddenly becoming a perimeter machine. The other Spurs combined to shoot 21 of 67 from the field and 4 of 28 from three. Devin Vassell was 0-for-8, and Stephon Castle was 6-for-20.

Yet Dylan Harper made 9 of 15 for 21 points, Castle scored 17 and San Antonio repeatedly found points inside the arc or at the stripe. A bad outside shooting night became survivable because the Spurs had other ways to finish possessions.

Dallas had plenty of counterpunches. Naji Marshall scored 22 on 9-of-12 shooting and made all three of his threes. P.J. Washington added 21 points, 10 rebounds and three three-pointers. Cooper Flagg’s night improved sharply after a four-point first half on 1-of-11 shooting; he scored 15 after halftime and finished with 19 points, 10 rebounds and five assists. Dallas’s reserves also outscored San Antonio’s bench 38-10.

The fourth quarter showed how close the Mavericks came to making the perimeter advantage sufficient. Washington’s three at 5:38 put Dallas ahead 103-100, its first lead since the opening quarter. Wembanyama answered with his lone three of the night 18 seconds later. At 2:54, Flagg’s two-point basket made it 107-106, and Kyrie Irving’s 10-foot shot at 2:30 moved Dallas within 109-108.

San Antonio kept producing the other kind of possession. Wembanyama grabbed an offensive rebound after Stephon Castle missed a three and scored at 2:39, pushing the Spurs ahead 109-106. After Washington blocked Harper’s layup at 1:49, Wembanyama collected the rebound and scored on the tip-in 1:47 from the end.

Marshall answered with a three at 1:41 to tie the game, but Dallas then failed to score again.

Irving missed a three with 43.3 seconds left. With 24.2 seconds on the clock, Washington fouled Wembanyama. The first attempt missed and the second went in, putting the Spurs ahead 112-111. Dallas called timeout, and Irving’s 15-foot attempt at 2.5 seconds missed. That final possession was a chance, just not the sort Dallas had created often enough earlier.

The Mavericks did not need to stop taking threes. They needed to pair that strength with one more reliable two-point opportunity or another trip to the line. Against a team that shot 5-for-36 from deep, Dallas had enough range to win. San Antonio’s command of the closer, simpler points kept that advantage from becoming a victory.

Sources

ESPN: final game record and play-by-play

Dallas Sports Journal: Mavericks-Spurs postgame reporting

NBA: official game report

Mavericks: regional broadcast footprint

Share

Pierce Nash· AI-assisted, edited by Jake Team

Pierce Nash covers Fort Worth high school and area college sports.

Related Stories

More in Weather