Fort Worth

FortWorthWeekly.news — Western roots. Neighborhood news for modern Fort Worth.

Back to Sport

Dallas’ Field-Goal Protection Needs to Catch Up With Its Ambition

Chase McLaughlin practiced fully Wednesday after Tuesday’s absence, removing uncertainty around Tampa Bay’s kicker. Dallas’ sharper concern is protecting its own kicking operation and refusing to make Tampa’s next possession easier.

Pierce Nash

October 8, 20264 min read

The 62-yard field-goal attempt was already an ambitious Sunday proposition before Houston’s Will Anderson Jr. blocked it. The more damaging part came afterward: Houston received the resulting field position and turned it into a field goal. Dallas had missed a chance to score and helped shorten the opponent’s route to points in the same breath.

That sequence remains the proper starting point for Thursday night in Arlington, with Tampa’s kicker expected to be available. Dallas has now allowed blocked field-goal attempts in two consecutive games. Jerry Jones placed the responsibility on protection in Wednesday radio comments and called the problem fixable.

That is the owner’s assessment, but it identifies the practical concern better than another debate about whether a 62-yard attempt was wise.

A long kick can fail without creating a crisis. A blocked kick changes possession geography. The kicking team loses its scoring opportunity, and the opponent may begin its next series closer to points than it would have after a routine miss or a successful kick.

Houston’s ensuing field goal made that distinction concrete. Dallas did not merely leave three points on the table; it allowed the mistake to improve Houston’s position on the field.

Wednesday removed one possible complication for Tampa Bay. Chase McLaughlin, who did not practice Tuesday because of a right groin/hip issue, practiced fully Wednesday and had no game designation. That makes Thursday’s expectation materially different from Tuesday’s uncertainty. There is no sound basis for Dallas to prepare as if the Buccaneers’ regular kicker will be absent.

The distinction matters because a kicker’s status can influence fourth-down choices, kickoff planning and how aggressively an offense tries to finish a possession. McLaughlin’s Wednesday participation gives Tampa the option of treating ordinary field-goal range as ordinary rather than building its decisions around a replacement. Dallas cannot count on an opponent’s drive ending short simply because Tuesday’s report looked ominous for a day.

Nor should the Cowboys’ own special-teams operation be treated as a minor detail against a Tampa defense that has been stingy with scoring chances. The Buccaneers have surrendered 282.8 total yards per game through four contests, and their opponents have converted red-zone trips into touchdowns 45.5% of the time.

Dallas averages 30.5 points and scores touchdowns on 81.3% of its red-zone possessions, so its offense has supplied plenty of evidence that it can finish. Still, finishing is harder when protection hands away a possession before the offense gets another chance.

There is a fair counterargument. A 62-yard try is not a standard kick, and a block on a difficult attempt does not prove Dallas will suffer the same failure from a more manageable distance. The Cowboys also rallied to beat Houston 34-30 on Sunday, scoring 28 points after halftime, so the offense showed enough resilience to survive the error.

But resilience should not become the special-teams plan. The repeated blocks make the protection question legitimate even if the original decisions belonged to different circumstances.

The Tampa matchup increases the cost of careless field position. The Buccaneers are 0-4 and average 19 points per game, while their defense has recorded six sacks through four games. Their offense has also allowed sacks on 12.70% of pass attempts, the NFL’s highest rate, which gives Dallas reason to expect opportunities to end drives.

That expectation must be paired with disciplined finishing rather than an assumption that every stalled Tampa possession will remain harmless.

The protection question also survives the choice of distance. A coach can make a defensible decision to try for points and still demand better work from the unit executing it. Repeated blocks deserve that scrutiny. Calling the attempt ambitious does not answer why an opponent was able to stop it before it reached the uprights.

McLaughlin’s full Wednesday practice leaves Dallas little reason to anticipate an emergency kicking arrangement. Dallas’ responsibility is less complicated. Its protection must preserve the value of the decision, whether the try comes from a routine distance or another ambitious spot.

Give Tampa a missed kick and the Cowboys can live with football’s ordinary uncertainty. Give Tampa the ball in better position because the assignment broke down, and Dallas will have created the problem itself.

Sources

Tampa Bay Buccaneers: dated injury report and game context

Tampa Bay Buccaneers: dated injury report and game context

Dallas Cowboys: team reporting

Dallas Cowboys: team reporting

Tampa Bay Buccaneers: dated injury report and game context

Share

Pierce Nash

Pierce Nash covers Fort Worth high school and area college sports.

Related Stories

More in Weather